The Dhaka Principles were devised by the Institute for Human Rights and Business in consultation with a range of stakeholders from business, government and civil society. They provide a strategic overview of the key challenges faced by business in relation to migrant workers and a guide to the due diligence and best practice companies should be undertaking to ensure migration with dignity.
You are encouraged to provide feedback on the Dhaka Principles to: dhakaprinciples@ihrb.org
up to February 15th 2012.
Dhaka Principles - Short Version [2 pages]
Dhaka Principles - Long Version [28 pages]
Consultation Draft
How to use: View more information about any principle by clicking on the principle title. Click anywhere on the greyed out area to return to the main diagram.
Excessive fees charged by recruitment agents, deception surrounding wage and benefit levels, contract substitution – these illegal but common practices leave many migrant workers vulnerable to incurring very heavy debt to secure a job. Debt bondage increases the risk the risk of exploitation, forced labour and vulnerability to trafficking. Forced labour and trafficking represent severe violations of human rights under international law.
Employers may be unaware of hidden fees being charged to migrant workers by brokers and middlemen, which can render the worker bonded labour even before arrival at the workplace. Compound interest on recruitment fee debt means many migrants are never able to repay their debt or find the value of their remittances is seriously eroded. This can have a negative impact on the economy in the sending country. It also means that workers may be more likely to leave their jobs to find illegal but better paid work in the shadow economy of the receiving country.
Much exploitation of migrant workers arises from deception surrounding working conditions, pay, hours of work etc. False contracts of employment, or ‘contract substitution’ i.e. contracts that bear no relation to the subsequent reality are commonplace. Additions to contracts on arrival in host countries can also add unexpected and unacceptable burdens and conditions on migrant workers, such as hidden deductions for food, transport, longer working hours, no overtime etc.
Contracts with third parties such as labour brokers and employment agencies rather than the workers directly can also leave workers vulnerable to exploitation and companies exposed to reputational and other risk.
Confiscation by employers or recruitment brokers in the receiving country of migrant worker passports, work permits and other identity documents is very common. This practice allows the company or agents to control the workers freedom of movement, ability to change jobs and compromises their ability and willingness to complain about poor conditions.
It also makes them vulnerable to unwarranted attention from local police and security services and can make it difficult to access consular / diplomatic assistance. It can also hinder them accessing other services such as banking. Confiscation of passports and other forms of ID is a contributory factor towards bonded and forced labour.
Where conditions are particularly poor, workers have been known to leave the workplace, forfeiting their passports or other personal ID documents. These workers are then extremely vulnerable as illegal migrants with no legal status, unable to find legal work, and denied access to any social or medical services.
Company codes do not always make specific reference to migrant workers. There is sometimes an assumption that they will be covered by general company codes but this is not always the case. Migrant workers will also frequently encounter unique circumstances and issues directly related to their migrant status, such as language, religious or cultural requirements. Where migrant workers are not explicitly included in company codes, any independent auditing process will often fail to pick up areas of particular concern and potential discrimination.
Migrant workers experience discrimination in most aspects of their employment, from basic double standards in relation to wage rates, to disregard for their religious beliefs and practices, or dietary requirements. Discrimination on the grounds of ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or health (e.g. HIV positive) is commonplace. This is exacerbated by the lack of legal protection or access to legal remedy available to migrant workers in most situations.
In many cases, workers who have become pregnant have been sent home or dismissed without payment of outstanding wages or the means to travel to their home country. These workers lack access to any form of legal protection or remedy and are particularly vulnerable to further exploitation.
Workplace discrimination against migrant workers can lead to ‘tiering’ of jobs, training, pay, overtime and other benefits. This can lead to tensions within the workforce as well as between workers and management.
Discrepancies between expected and actual wages present a major issue for many migrant workers. False accounting, and unregulated payment systems, fraud and deliberate withholding of payments due are common methods both of exploitation and control of migrant workers. In many cases, migrant workers are paid less then local employees for the same work.
Irregularity of payments and withholding of pay can cause serious financial difficulties for migrants many of whom will have taken on considerable debt. Missed repayments of loans can incur considerable additional penalties and even deeper debt.
Migrant workers are sometimes barred from joining trade unions or participating in other forms of workplace representation. This may be due to discrimination, intimidation, failing to provide the migrant workers access to the union official or worker representative or not providing proper information in the migrants’ languages to inform them of their rights and choices. Freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining are fundamental human rights. Companies which do not guarantee these rights to workers in their employment are violating international labour rights.
Many migrant workers lack access to clear, robust and independent grievance processes. There is often a lack of awareness among migrant workers of their rights to bring legitimate complaints of harassment, discrimination or unfair treatment to a confidential grievance body. Migrants may be denied access to worker representatives who could advise them on the process to access independent legal advice. This situation is frequently exacerbated by language barriers. They may fear discrimination, intimidation, or losing their jobs and being repatriated. This fear will be particularly acute where their levels of debt are excessively high and where there may be outstanding wages and benefits.
Health and safety provision for migrant workers is often sub-standard. Migrants are not always included in standard company health and safety training. Language, culture and comprehension issues often compound many migrants’ lack of awareness of health and safety issues. Health and safety training, manuals, sign-age and product/equipment labelling are often not translated into relevant languages for the migrant workers, posing significant health and safety risks in the workplace.
Withholding of final wages and other deductions at the end of employment can present difficulties for migrant workers who on completion of contracts (and possibly work permits) lack leverage with former employers. In some cases, workers are left to make their own arrangements for return at their own cost. Once a migrant worker’s contract has expired, the worker is in a particularly vulnerable situation unless provision of safe return has been included in the contract.